Following are the profile sonic boom angles measured for the four configurations.
Sonic | Cnfg 1 | cal |
| Cnfg 2 | cal |
| Cnfg 3a | Cnfg 3b | cal |
| Cnfg4 | cal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| twh |
|
| srs |
|
| spo | jm |
|
| spo |
|
| july 6-14 |
|
| july 28 |
|
| aug 1 | aug 6 |
|
| aug 12 |
|
1.5 m | 132.3 | 0.6 |
| 131.6 | -0.1 |
| 135.1 | 132.4 | 0.7 |
| 132.3 | 0.6 |
3 m | 136.0 | 4.3 |
| 132.5* | 0.8 |
| 137.0 | 134.2 | 2.5 |
| 133.1 | 1.4 |
4 m | 133.6 | 1.9 |
| 129.8* | -1.9 |
| 136.1* | 132.5* | 0.8 |
| 131.8 | 0.1 |
5.5 m | 134.6 | 2.9 |
| 133.7* | 2.0 |
| 138.2* | 134.8* | 3.1 |
| 133.4 | 1.7 |
7 m | 134.0 | 2.3 |
| 132.2 | 0.5 |
| 136.2* | 134.4*# | 2.7 |
| 133.8 | 2.1 |
8m | 132.6 | 0.9 |
| 133.7 | 2.0 |
| 137.0 | 133.0# | 1.3 |
| 134.3# | 2.6 |
*: sonic height changed from previous configuration
...
following azimuths than are 3a. I (TWHtwh) used 3b for the profile cal_files.
Both semmer Semmer and oncley Oncley measured azimuths for the horizontal arrays in configuration
2, and militzer Militzer and oncley Oncley measured azimuths for the horizontal arrays in
configuration 3. In both cases, oncleyOncley's azimuth measurements were ~4 degrees
larger than the others. Thus we will use semmers Semmer's azimuths for configuration2
and militzers militzer's for configuration 3 . Also oncley recommends using the 'surveyed'
horizontal array azimuths for configuration 4, which in this case are mostly very close to Oncley's measurements.