Normally we do not use data at wind directions of +/- 45 degrees from 180 (in sonic coordinates), in order to eliminate winds blowing through the tower and into the back of the sonic. Because However, because of the topography at RIM, I used data at +/- 60 about the nominal axis of the gap, SSW or 202.5 deg. The tilt plots are done with respect to the sonic u axis, which was pointed to 253 degrees. Thus in instrument coordinates, the acceptable data is from -10 deg to 110 deg.
Also at RIM, there is a systematic descent of air into the crater, i.e. a vertical flow normal to the "surface". I find more believable realistic lean angles by setting w.off = 0 and use the latter results in the RIM cal_files.Can recalculate these at end of project.
sonic | lean (deg) | leanaz (deg) | w offset (cm/s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3m.near | 0.6 1 | -3.5 2 | -1 2 | ||||||
10m.near | 1.0 | 11 9.5 9 | -2 | ||||||
15m.near | 0.6 5 | 47 43.9 2 | 0 | ||||||
20m.near | 0.7 6 | 32 27.3 8 | -1 | ||||||
25m.near | 1.1 0 | 77 79.9 1 | -1 | ||||||
30m.near | 0.7 | 32 38.3 1 | -1 2 | ||||||
35m.near | 0.9 7 | 114 112.5 2 | -2 | ||||||
40m.near | 0.8 6 | 89 96.3 2 | 1 0 | ||||||
45m.near | 1.2 1 | 47 33.8 7 | -1 | ||||||
50m.near | 1 0.0 8 | 37 34.4 0 | 0 | ||||||
5m.rim | 1.5 3 | -10291.8 -2 | 1.1 | -96.7 | 0 | ||||
10m.rim | 3.1 | 136.4 | -14 | 2.2 | -122.7 |
| 2.1 | -132.5 | 0 |
15m.rim | 2.9 | -131.9 | -20 |
| 1.4 7 | -123107.2 5 | 0 | ||
20m.rim | 2.8 | -134.6 | -22 |
| 1.2 4 | -133109.0 7 | 0 | ||
25m.rim | 2.7 | -147.2 | -25 |
| 1.1 | -162119.1 2 | 0 | ||
30m.rim | 3.1 | -146.6 | -26 |
| 1.4 | -158126.7 2 | 0 | ||
35m.rim | 1.2 .8 | -139101.3 4 | -29 |
| 0.8 | ||||
-141.9 | 0 | 40m.rim | 3.9 | -131.0 | -29 |
| 2.0 4 | -123110.8 | 0 |
3m.far | 1.0 1 | -31.6 8 | -1 2 | ||||||
3m.flr | 0.5 7 | 167 162.6 1 | -3 | ||||||
3m ssw2.ssw2 flr | 10.2 1 | -59.1 0 | 3 2 | ||||||
3m ssw4.ssw4 flr | 30.6 5 | -3938.4 2 | -4 5 |