OBS:

Ingest:


UFO:

JEDI:

ALGO:

HTLM Christian:

Model naming convention Steve V:

GEOS Clementine:

B matrix:

Snow DA:

INFRA:

Model Interface:

- Improving robustnesthe s of interpolators for the structured grids used in SABER

CRTM: 

(1) Ben is working on upgrading the instrument coefficient generation package, and training in-kind contributors on this matter.
(2) Cheng is developing the optical profile generation package for the CRTM optical generic interface.
(3) The CRTM team is working on several reported issues from collaborators and JCSDA core members regarding CRTM v3.1.0/v2.4.0, including (1) the JEDI/UFO interface for CMAQ aerosol LUT; (2) CRTM calculation for aircraft based sensors.

SOCA:

We moved the soca-specific diffusion saber central block into a generic code in oops/saber. PRs are open now for that. This has been tested with FV3 and SOCA and seems to be working well. It is NOT working for ROMS and MPAS due to an issue with atlas mesh generation. When finished this is a good alternative to BUMP_NICAS for those with very small length scales.

NOAA: 

GFS-17:

Regional (RRFS V2)

Atmospheric DA

AI/ML

UFO acceptance: 

GMAO:


MetOffice:

Philip Underwood reported an issue Chris Thomas (in copy) has identified with the MPI distribution of global aircraft observations. When looking at this obtype in isolation, it’s been identified that some MPI communicators are handling several million locations, whereas others may only be handling tens of thousands (see attached image). Interpolating these to generate the GeoVals is taking a long time as the round-robin distribution means that many of the locations are in geographical regions that are not covered by the model region their MPI communicator is handling. As a result, there is a significant amount of MPI communication taking place for interpolation.

 

Chris has made three suggestions to explore and potentially solve this issue:

  1. Exclude locations that failed thinning prior to calling GetValues
  2. Separate pre-filter step
  3. Create an obs domain decomposition that matches the model one

The following discussion led to the first question; is this problem related to 3D or 4D? Apparently, these issues are less pronounced with 4D. Francois Hebert said that changing the obs distribution would not fix the issue, and that isolating and looking at a single ob type enhances this problem. Hernan G Arango described a more technical approach to MPI distribution, that to be honest I didn’t understand.


(plot was sent after the JEDI meeting for a reference)

NCAR:

reported an issue when we run mpas-jedi in 4DEnVar mode: it will fail if we turn on the output of geovals and ydiags files. Will create an issue for this and seek the solution.