This is to get an overall sense of where data are not being reported or are bad/suspicious. Green is good or N/A until it isn't. 

Link to ISFS SWEX Data Issue Tracker


Sensors1s2s3s4s5s6s7s8s9s10s11s12s13s14s15s16s17s18
2D sonic (5)

















3D sonic (4)

















IRGA














offscale, but

irgadiag ok



TRH (2)


bad Rfan values













P (3)

















Rpile.in (7)


















Rpile.out

















Rsw.in

















Rsw.out

















Gsoil

both normal

and .cr



both normal

and .cr









Planned to, but

didn't deploy .cr






Qsoil

















TP01

















Tsoil.0.6cm

















Tsoil.1.9cm

















Tsoil.3.1cm

















Tsoil.4.4cm

















OTT (1)

















Victron

















GPS









low nsat






cell ant needed?
Y?


Y?



Y?
Y?




  • No labels

8 Comments

  1. Steve Oncley

    I've just filled in, based on ncharts.  I also used green on the top row to indicate if a site is installed.  Half of the sites are set up (9/18), but only 1 has everything working.  Fortunately, that one is the hardest to get to!  I guess Isabel and I will be busy!

    P.S. pio revived P.s9



  2. Jacquelyn Witte

    s1, s10

    • 2D and 3D wind directions look like they are significantly offset, as opposed to measuring different directions.  Oddly only the direction. The speeds are similar.


    s4

    • Why are do the radiometer variable names include ‘cr’, i.e. Rpile.in.cr.s4. Is this a different type of radiometer other than NR01? I just want to be sure the naming convention is consistent. 


    1. Matt Paulus

      The S1 Gill and CSAT have different Vazimuth values in their cal files, offset by 180 degrees, which may explain this difference. The booms are typically at different bearings and the sensors have different internal orientations to north, so I think we will want to clarify this during a visit to the site at some point.  

    2. Gary Granger

      Three sites have an extra mote for testing sensors with new PIC boards: s1, s4, and s13.  Steve added the .cr suffix to differentiate them, I assume it stands for Chris Roden, since it's his test.  So the variables without the .cr are from the "standard" sensors, but I assume they should be similar to the variables from the test sensors.  I further assume we'll have to decide later whether the test variables should be part of any published datasets.

  3. Jacquelyn Witte

    • s11 data stuttered then went off NCharts early this morning. 


    • Qsoil.s8 is not like the others


    • I’m not sure what to expect but Qsoil.cs is really offset from Qsoil. The differences are not as great in the other soil parameters.

  4. Jacquelyn Witte

    It’s showtime!  Looking at the last 24 hr on NCharts


    SHT at s17 was replaced on 31 March (https://wiki.ucar.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=484347000)

    • Filter data prior to April Fools 08:22:30.


    Qsoil.s10 is bad - definitely not like the others. 


    Tsoil.0.6cm.s13 is bad - measures around -25C

    • Note: Vheat.s13 (and Vheat.cr.s1) is not like the others


    Tsoils at s17 - OK now. 

    • Filter before Mar 31 13:57:30

    1. Isabel Suhr

      We noticed tsoil.0.6cm.s13, but currently don't have a spare tsoil to replace it with.

  5. Jacquelyn Witte

    Looking at time series for the past 4 days, data looks good to me overall (happy face).

    Qsoil.s10 - measurements like the others since 2022 Apr 02 11:22:30. Added filter to cal files.