This is to get an overall sense of where data are not being reported or are bad/suspicious. Green is good or N/A until it isn't.
Link to ISFS SWEX Data Issue Tracker
Sensor | s1 | s2 | s3 | s4 | s5 | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 | s10 | s11 | s12 | s13 | s14 | s15 | s16 | s17 | s18 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2D sonic (5) | ||||||||||||||||||
3D sonic (4) | ||||||||||||||||||
IRGA | offscale, but irgadiag ok | |||||||||||||||||
TRH (2) | bad Rfan values | |||||||||||||||||
P (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Rpile.in (7) | ||||||||||||||||||
Rpile.out | ||||||||||||||||||
Rsw.in | ||||||||||||||||||
Rsw.out | ||||||||||||||||||
Gsoil | both normal and .cr | both normal and .cr | Planned to, but didn't deploy .cr | |||||||||||||||
Qsoil | ||||||||||||||||||
TP01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tsoil.0.6cm | ||||||||||||||||||
Tsoil.1.9cm | ||||||||||||||||||
Tsoil.3.1cm | ||||||||||||||||||
Tsoil.4.4cm | ||||||||||||||||||
OTT (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Victron | ||||||||||||||||||
GPS | low nsat | |||||||||||||||||
cell ant needed? | Y? | Y? | Y? | Y? |
8 Comments
Steve Oncley
I've just filled in, based on ncharts. I also used green on the top row to indicate if a site is installed. Half of the sites are set up (9/18), but only 1 has everything working. Fortunately, that one is the hardest to get to! I guess Isabel and I will be busy!
P.S. pio revived P.s9
Jacquelyn Witte
s1, s10
s4
Matt Paulus
The S1 Gill and CSAT have different Vazimuth values in their cal files, offset by 180 degrees, which may explain this difference. The booms are typically at different bearings and the sensors have different internal orientations to north, so I think we will want to clarify this during a visit to the site at some point.
Gary Granger
Three sites have an extra mote for testing sensors with new PIC boards: s1, s4, and s13. Steve added the .cr suffix to differentiate them, I assume it stands for Chris Roden, since it's his test. So the variables without the .cr are from the "standard" sensors, but I assume they should be similar to the variables from the test sensors. I further assume we'll have to decide later whether the test variables should be part of any published datasets.
Jacquelyn Witte
Qsoil.s8 is not like the others
Jacquelyn Witte
It’s showtime! Looking at the last 24 hr on NCharts
SHT at s17 was replaced on 31 March (https://wiki.ucar.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=484347000)
Qsoil.s10 is bad - definitely not like the others.
Tsoil.0.6cm.s13 is bad - measures around -25C
Tsoils at s17 - OK now.
Isabel Suhr
We noticed tsoil.0.6cm.s13, but currently don't have a spare tsoil to replace it with.
Jacquelyn Witte
Looking at time series for the past 4 days, data looks good to me overall (happy face).
Qsoil.s10 - measurements like the others since 2022 Apr 02 11:22:30. Added filter to cal files.