...
| b | t | u | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 134.7 134.7 |
|
| ||
2 | 136.3 136.1 |
|
| ||
3 | 135.3 136.1 | 137.3 | 140.3 | ||
4 | 136.2 136.4 | 136.3 | 136.2 | ||
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="64f08e48d1c2c283-187de70b-48b948bc-8e6cad23-5199f035de23d1b6ebf5827a"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[ | 5 | 134.8 134.7 | [133.6] | 136.1 | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> |
6 | 133.9 134.1 | 133.3 | 134.1 | ||
7 | 135.3 135.8 | 135.2 | 134.5 | ||
8 | 136.4 136.8 | 137.5 | 130.4 | ||
9 | 134.7 135.1 | 136.3 | 132.2 | ||
10 | 135.4 135.2 | 134.9 | 133.1 | ||
11 | 137.4 136.8 | 136.1 | 134.9 | ||
12 | 136.5 135.8 |
|
| ||
13 | 136.5 136.1 |
|
|
P.S. Today (the following morning) I've entered all of the Oncley angles -131.7 degrees into each of the cal_files in boom_normal. We'll see if the wind azimuths start falling into place.
A new set of angles shot by Semmer on 7/28.
| b | t | u |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | 131.7 |
|
|
2 | 131.1 |
|
|
3 | 131.8 | 132.4 | 137.4 |
4 | 131.5 | 131.5 | 132.4 |
5 | 131.7 | 130.4 | 133.0 |
6 | 129.9 | 130.2 | 131.1 |
7 | 131.5 | 131.5 | 130.6 |
8 | 132.1 | 133.9 | 127.7 |
9 | 132.0 | 133.6 | 129.0 |
10 | 132.1 | 132.2 | 130.2 |
11 | 133.3 | 133.2 | 131.8 |
12 | 132.3 |
|
|
13 | 132.5 |
|
|