You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

(This is an email from Katherine McCaffrey at NOAA.)

Hi all, 

Here are the [b0  b1  b2] values:
50m
nw = [0.0103  0.0225  0.0041]
se = [-0.0088 0.0107 -0.0133]
100m
nw = [-0.0042  0.0261  0.0041]
se = [-0.0258 0.0012 0.0060]
150m
nw = [-0.0043 0.0197 0.0140]
se = [-0.0169 0.0011 -0.0038]
200m
nw = [-0.0046 0.0134 -0.0074] 
se = [-0.0059 0.0045 -0.0059]
250m
nw = [0.0156  0.0133  0.0064]
se = [-0.0126  0.0027  0.0162]
300m
nw = [0.0866  0.0112  0.0183]
se = [0.0692  -0.0097  0.0019]
Thanks for running the corrections and statistics, Steve! I'll write up a little blurb to put on the blog about how the tilt correction method works. 
Cheers, 
Katie
On 7/9 Katherine sent an email with revised tilts for the NW sonics and the tilts for the flux stations:
Hi Gordon, I have the planar fit coefficients for the flux stations below, as well as a corrected version of the northwest booms' tilts (I found an error in it). The southeast sonics are unchanged.
Sorry for the delay - confusion with Tom Horst, so I ended up taking out 45 degrees on either side of the boom as you'd suggested! 
50m_nw:   -0.0092    0.0216    0.0044
100m_nw:   -0.0014    0.0268    0.0040
150m_nw:   -0.0052    0.0182   -0.0139
200m_nw:   -0.0054    0.0117   -0.0072
250m_nw:    0.0106    0.0107    0.0065
300m_nw:    0.0622    0.0061    0.0130
50m_se:   -0.0088   -0.0107   -0.0133
100m_se:   -0.0258    0.0012    0.0060
150m_se:   -0.0169    0.0011   -0.0038
200m_se:   -0.0059    0.0045   -0.0059
250m_se:   -0.0126    0.0027    0.0162
300m_se:    0.0692   -0.0097    0.0019
5m_ehs:  -0.0027   0.0288   -0.0035
5m_bao:  -0.0064   -0.0087   0.0010
  • No labels