issues in the current FVcubed dycore (parallelization, performance)
Extensive problems on Jaguar (Art), still many on bluefire
Latest GEOS FVcubed release may solve some problems.
current workaround/fix: no 4th order divergence damping with potential for noisy simulations
Noise can be compensated for with higher 2nd order DD
Upgrade to FVcubed may solve this
upgrade of the dycore to the newest NASA version, pathway for future upgrades
Brian now can compile FVcubed on Bluefire and Dublin (PGI)
Lahey still an issue
Will has started modifying CAM-GFDL interface FV_StateMod to accommodate new release. 1-2 days of work
status of baroclinic tests and built-in test suite
Test cases 1-2 run, with tracers 1234. Results available
Test case 4 seems to be running
Test 5 develops a wave-4 instability, run dies after 0.5 days. So far tried different divergence damping configurations, is time step unstable? Test ran fine during 2008 colloquium. Further investigations needed
Test cases 3, 6: problems with specification of the hybrid coefficients for the 60 and 20 levels, Will investigates
status of the ideal physics tests (Held-Suarez)
400 day simulation available. Results look good.
status of the aqua-planet tests
Runs for 5 days, but cubed sphere artifacts appear.
Dry air mass adjustment runs. Some scientific questions remain.
offline interpolation of the CAM history files with interpolation package GECoRe: status and current issues
It is running now for both history and restart NetCDF files!
Assumes equi-angular grid - not the case in FVCUBED; initialization needs to be tweaked (Paul and Christtiane)
Document on WIKI page (Will)
initial condition netcdf files and use of the interpic_new tool
This all works as advertized.
Document on WIKI page (Will)
science issues with the dry air adjustment routine in the dycore
Discuss with S.J.
Mark Taylor has worked on this - contact
Open software engineering issues: (Will, Brian)
restart
Bug found in mapping
Now runs, but there is still a subtle bug
Something in fv_dynamics is not being set directly
upgrade to new version: time line and complexity
More information by the end of Friday, May 29.
analytic (online) initialization of the staggered edge-tangent velocities
After discussion with
use of routine outfld
ESMF clock
will the namelist option INIC work? If yes, with staggered velocities?
Performance analyses (Art, Pat)
selection of test case for performance studies: test 2 (baroclinic wave)
FVcubed model configurations (resolution, number of tracers)
compilation and run time issues on Bluefire and Jaguar