You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Nov 30, 2010.  Visited several sites to install recalibrated kh2o's.

Site 2 (ABC) 1389 head bad; output ~30 mv.  Installed 1393 about 10:30; output ~2 V.

     twh (3/1/11): dat("w") shows mast down ~ 09:15 - 10:35; high-rate w suggests similar period

Site 3 (Highland) Arrived ~ 11:15

                          1333 head  bad; output ~30 mv

                          1258 head bad; output ~20 mv

                          1390 head bad; output ~20 mv

                          1525 good!; output 2.2 V

Attached 1133 head to 1525 electronics and warmed head; still bad.

Reattached 1525 head; output 2.3 V.

Reattached 1525 head and left.

   twh (3/1/11): dat("w") suggests mast down ~ 11:25 -  12:35; high-rate w suggests similar period

Site 1 (Playa) Installed 1395 around 14:30.  Also tested 1394, which was good.

   twh (3/1/11): dat("w") suggests mast down ~ 14:10 - 14:35; high-rate data suggests 14:07 - 14:34

Site 7 (Riverton) Installed 1394 around 15:55; output ~2.3 V.

   twh (3/1/11): dat("w") suggests mast down ~ 15:45 - 16:05; high-rate w shows 15:47 - 16:03

Dec 1, 2010:  Completed kh2o installation.

Cleaned 'bad' kh2o's by scrubbing with qtips and distilled water. 

1133 went from 30 mv to 2 V

1258 went from 14 mv to 2 V

1389 went from 23 mv to 2 V

1390 went from 11 mv to 1.7 V.  Designated as spare.

Site 4 (West Valley): 12:10 installed kh2o 1258; 2 V output

    twh (3/1/11): dat("w") suggests mast down ?~ 11:35 - 12:15; high-rate w shows 11:41 -  12:15

Site 6 (West Slope): 14:30 installed kh2o 1389; 2 V output

    twh (3/1/11): mast does not appear to have been lowered

Site 5 (East Slope): 15:50 installed kh2o 1133; 2 V output

   twh (3/1/11): dat("w") suggests mast down ?~ 15:30 - 15:50; high-rate w shows 15:31 - 15:55

  • No labels