...
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
\- The coring tool was set up with two 3cm rings on the top (used) followed by two 1cm rings on the bottom (ignored). Thus, each 3cm sample volume was 3*pi*(5.231/2)^2=2266.4cm^3 \[check\]. |
Site/Time | Depth | ID | Tare(g) | Wet(g) | Dry(g) | Rho-dry (g/cm^3) | Qsoil (% mass) | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (wet-dry)/wet |
| ||
1 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 3.5 | 73 | 47.9 | 0.67 | 36 |
| ||
5Jan 0950 | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3.7 | 123 | 101.9 | 1.48 | 18 |
| ||
2 | 0-3 | 3-0 | 3.3 | 90 | 74 | 1.06 | 18 | Soil damp&sticky | ||
4Jan1410 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 3.6 | 129 | 121 | 1.77 | 6 | Piece of brick | ||
3 | 0-3 2.5 | 1-0 | 3.4 | 89 89# | 68 | 1.17 | 25 | Only ~2.5cm thick | ||
3Jan1500 | 2.5-5.5 3-6 | 1-6 | 3.4 | 148 148# | 124 | 1.82 | 17 |
| ||
4 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 3.5 | 152 152# | 122 | 1.78 | 20 |
| ||
3Jan1636 | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3.7 | 137 137# | 115 | 1.68 | 17 |
| ||
5 | 0-3 | 1-0 | 3.4 | 103 | 87.2 | 1.26 | 16 |
| ||
5Jan 1445 | 3-6 | 1-6 | 3.4 | 99 | 89.9 | 1.30 | 10 |
| ||
6 | 0-4 | 1-0 | 3.4 | 97.4* |
|
| 61.4 | 0.66 | 38 | Soil was frozen, |
6Jan 1012 | 4-6 | 1-6 | 3.4 | 72.2 |
|
| 58.0 | 1.23 | 21 | so odd depths (approx) |
7 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 3.5 | 40.9* |
|
| 23.75 | 0.30 | 46 |
|
6Jan 1140 | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3.7 | 77.4 | 59.4 | 0.84 | 24 |
|
|
|
# = weighed wet a day later (but kept cold to reduce water loss)
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
\* = weight after a bit of time in the oven \:( \[forgot to write down first reading\], water content will be a bit low, but dry density will be okay |
Here is a quick comparison of the weights of various objects with the borrowed scale and ours. The borrowed scale read within 1g, so I wouldn't change any of the above readings.
...