This will be my template for this round of soil sample processing.

A few notes:

- We forgot to pack the scale, so ours is being sent.  In the meantime, I've borrowed one (generously loaned by John H) with a resolution of 1g.  When our scale arrives, I'll make a few parallel measurements to compare the two scales.

- We couldn't find any good foil cups at the store today to bake the dirt in, so I've made some by bending aluminum foil.  Obviously, they won't tare as consistently as store-bought.

- The coring tool was set up with two 3cm rings on the top (used) followed by two 1cm rings on the bottom (ignored).  Thus, each 3cm sample volume was 3*pi*(5.31/2)^2=66.4cm^3.

Site/Time

Depth

ID

Tare(g)

Wet(g)

Dry(g)

Rho-dry (g/cm^3)

Qsoil (% mass)

Volume fraction (%)

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(wet-dry)/wet

(wet-dry)*rho_water/vol

 

1

0-3

2-0

3.5

73

47.9

0.67

36

37

 

5Jan 0950

3-6

2-6

3.7

123

101.9

1.48

18

32

 

2

0-3

3-0

3.3

90

74

1.06

18

24

Soil damp&sticky

4Jan1410

3-6

3-6

3.6

129

121

1.77

6

12

Piece of brick

3

0-2.5

1-0

3.4

89#

68

1.17

25

38

Only ~2.5cm thick

3Jan1500

2.5-5.5

1-6

3.4

148#

124

1.82

17

36

 

4

0-3

2-0

3.5

152#

122

1.78

20

45

 

3Jan1636

3-6

2-6

3.7

137#

115

1.68

17

33

 

5

0-3

1-0

3.4

103

87.2

1.26

16

24

 

5Jan 1445

3-6

1-6

3.4

99

89.9

1.30

10

14

 

6

0-4

1-0

3.4

97.4*

61.4

0.66

38

41

Soil was frozen,

6Jan 1012

4-6

1-6

3.4

72.2

58.0

1.23

21

32

so odd depths (approx)

7

0-3

2-0

3.5

40.9*

23.75

0.30

46

26

 

6Jan 1140

3-6

2-6

3.7

77.4

59.4

0.84

24

27

 

# = weighed wet a day later (but kept cold to reduce water loss)

* = weight after a bit of time in the oven :( [forgot to write down first reading], water content will be a bit low, but dry density will be okay

Here is a quick comparison of the weights of various objects with the borrowed scale and ours.  The borrowed scale read within 1g, so I wouldn't change any of the above readings.

Ours (g)

Borrowed (g)

3.6

3

3.3

3

48.5

49

85.1

85

116.3

117

145.2

146

ROUND TWO:

Warmer temperatures have both melted snow (and there has been rain) to increase moisture and liquified existing moisture to allow the EC-5s to measure it.

Site/Time

Depth

ID

Tare (g)

Wet (g)

Dry (g)

Rho-dry

Qsoil

Volume Fraction

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

0-3

1-0

3.4

135.6

107.3

1.57

21

43

 

17 Jan 0835

3-6

1-6

3.5

163.3

138.4

2.03

16

37

May have been compressed

2

0-3

4-0

3.6

92.0

73.3

1.05

21

28

a bit frozen

18 Jan 0828

3-6

4-6

3.8

96.3

86.8

1.25

10

14

 

3

0-3

2-0

3.6

69.5

38.5

0.53

47

47

grass

17 Jan 1010

3-6

2-6

3.7

138.3

111.1

1.62

20

41

 

4

0-3

1-0

3.5

131.1

108.9

1.59

17

33

 

19 Jan 1140

3-6

1-6

3.5

132.1

111.3

1.62

16

31

 

5 main

0-3

3-0

3.3

113.1

82.8

1.20

28

46

water (frozen)

17 Jan 1120

3-6

3-6

3.6

112.1

89.5

1.29

21

34

 

5 aux

0-3

4-0

3.6

124.8

105.2

1.53

16

30

 

17 Jan 1132

3-6

4-6

3.8

120.1

104.8

1.52

13

23

 

6

0-3

5-0

3.8

110.2

86.8

1.25

21

35

 

19 Jan 1420

3-6

5-6

3.4

131.7

112.0

1.63

15

30

 

6 aux

0-3

3-0

3.4

139.5

113.5

1.66

19

39

 

19 Jan 1425

3-6

3-6

3.6

129.0

104.6

1.52

19

37

 

7

0-3

5-0

3.8

90.9

48.7

0.68

48

64

water (frozen)

17 Jan 1221

3-6

5-6

3.4

112.4

82.6

1.19

27

45

water

ROUND THREE:

John, Tom, and Steve S

We tared the scale prior to weighing the wet soil (net), weighed the dry soil + pan (total), then subtracted the pan wt to get the dry soil (net).

I mistakenly started weighing the soil in ounces, so we continued this in order to make a consistent table.

Ring diameter = 2 3/32" = 2.094" = 5.319 cm; volume = 66.66 cm^3;  1 oz = 28.35 gm

Qsoil = 1 - dry/wet; h2o volume fraction = (wet-dry)/(1 gm per cm^3)/sample-volume

Site

Time

Depth
(cm)

Tray ID

Tare
(oz)

Wet Wt
net (oz)

Dry Wt
total (oz)

Dry Wt
net (oz)

rho-dry
(gm/cm^3

Qsoil
(% mass)

h2o vol fraction
(% volume)

1

Jan 30 10:45

0-3

4-0

0.130

2.845

1.575

1.445

0.615

47

54

 

 

3-6

4-6

0.135

4.700

3.900

3.765

1.601

18

34

2

Jan 29 14:30

0-3

4-0

0.130

3.825

3.440

3.310

1.408

10

16

 

 

3-6

4-6

0.135

4.400

4.185

4.050

1.722

5

   9

3

Jan 28 14:30

0-3

3-0

0.120

3.195

3.120

3.000

1.276

2

   3

 

 

3-6

3-6

0.125

4.810

4.100

3.975

1.691

15

30

4

Jan 28 11:15

0-3

2-0

0.120

2.365

2.045

1.925

0.819

14

14

 

 

3-6

2-6

0.130

4.875

4.335

4.205

1.788

11

23

5 main

Jan 27 14:31

0-3

4-0

0.130

3.060

2.525

2.395

1.019

18

23

 

 

3-6

4-6

0.135

3.790

3.395

3.260

1.386

11

17

5 aux

Jan 27 14:55

0-3

5-0

0.140

3.625

3.130

2.990

1.272

14

21

 

 

3-6

5-6

0.120

2.495

2.390

2.270

0.965

4

   4

6 main

Jan 24 11:45

0-3

4-0

0.135

4.415

3.305

3.170

1.348

26

47

 

 

3-6

4-6

0.125

5.705

4.890

4.765

2.027

15

35

6 aux

Jan 24 12:15

0-3

2-0

0.135

3.420

2.715

2.580

1.097

21

30

 

 

3-6

2-6

0.130

4.775

4.094

3.964

1.686

15

29

7

Jan 27 16:18

0-3

1-0

0.125

3.115

2.200

2.075

0.882

31

39

 

 

3-6

1-6

0.125

3.635

2.785

2.660

1.131

24

36

P.S. (18 Apr 2011): All calculations seemed off in Round 3, reran and edited above entries.