You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Next »

This will be my template for this round of soil sample processing.

A few notes:

- We forgot to pack the scale, so ours is being sent.  In the meantime, I've borrowed one (generously loaned by John H) with a resolution of 1g.  When our scale arrives, I'll make a few parallel measurements to compare the two scales.

- We couldn't find any good foil cups at the store today to bake the dirt in, so I've made some by bending aluminum foil.  Obviously, they won't tare as consistently as store-bought.

- The coring tool was set up with two 3cm rings on the top (used) followed by two 1cm rings on the bottom (ignored).  Thus, each 3cm sample volume was 3*pi*(5.31/2)^2=66.4cm^3.

Site/Time

Depth

ID

Tare(g)

Wet(g)

Dry(g)

Rho-dry (g/cm^3)

Qsoil (% mass)

Volume fraction (%)

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(wet-dry)/wet

(wet-dry)*rho_water/vol

 

1

0-3

2-0

3.5

73

47.9

0.67

36

37

 

5Jan 0950

3-6

2-6

3.7

123

101.9

1.48

18

32

 

2

0-3

3-0

3.3

90

74

1.06

18

24

Soil damp&sticky

4Jan1410

3-6

3-6

3.6

129

121

1.77

6

12

Piece of brick

3

0-2.5

1-0

3.4

89#

68

1.17

25

38

Only ~2.5cm thick

3Jan1500

2.5-5.5

1-6

3.4

148#

124

1.82

17

36

 

4

0-3

2-0

3.5

152#

122

1.78

20

45

 

3Jan1636

3-6

2-6

3.7

137#

115

1.68

17

33

 

5

0-3

1-0

3.4

103

87.2

1.26

16

24

 

5Jan 1445

3-6

1-6

3.4

99

89.9

1.30

10

14

 

6

0-4

1-0

3.4

97.4*

61.4

0.66

38

41

Soil was frozen,

6Jan 1012

4-6

1-6

3.4

72.2

58.0

1.23

21

32

so odd depths (approx)

7

0-3

2-0

3.5

40.9*

23.75

0.30

46

26

 

6Jan 1140

3-6

2-6

3.7

77.4

59.4

0.84

24

27

 

# = weighed wet a day later (but kept cold to reduce water loss)

* = weight after a bit of time in the oven :( [forgot to write down first reading], water content will be a bit low, but dry density will be okay

Here is a quick comparison of the weights of various objects with the borrowed scale and ours.  The borrowed scale read within 1g, so I wouldn't change any of the above readings.

Ours (g)

Borrowed (g)

3.6

3

3.3

3

48.5

49

85.1

85

116.3

117

145.2

146

ROUND TWO:

Warmer temperatures have both melted snow (and there has been rain) to increase moisture and liquified existing moisture to allow the EC-5s to measure it.

Site/Time

Depth

ID

Tare (g)

Wet (g)

Dry (g)

Rho-dry

Qsoil

Volume Fraction

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

0-3

1-0

3.4

135.6

107.3

 

 

 

 

17 Jan 0835

3-6

1-6

3.5

163.3

138.4

 

 

 

May have been compressed

2

0-3

4-0

3.6

92.0

 

 

 

 

a bit frozen

18 Jan 0828

3-6

4-6

3.8

96.3

 

 

 

 

 

3

0-3

2-0

3.6

69.5

38.5

 

 

 

grass

17 Jan 1010

3-6

2-6

3.7

138.3

111.1

 

 

 

 

4

0-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 main

0-3

3-0

3.3

113.1

82.8

 

 

 

water (frozen)

17 Jan 1120

3-6

3-6

3.6

112.1

89.5

 

 

 

 

5 aux

0-3

4-0

3.6

124.8

105.2

 

 

 

 

17 Jan 1132

3-6

4-6

3.8

120.1

104.8

 

 

 

 

6

0-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6 aux

0-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

0-3

5-0

3.8

90.9

48.7

 

 

 

water (frozen)

17 Jan 1221

3-6

5-6

3.4

112.4

82.6

 

 

 

water

  • No labels